This paper identifies the current challenges of the mechanisation, digitisation and automation of public sector systems and processes, and proposes a modern and practical framework to ensure and assure ethical and high veracity Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Automated Decision Making (ADM) systems in public institutions. This framework is designed for the specific context of the public sector, in the jurisdictional and constitutional context of Australia, but is extendable to other jurisdictions and private sectors. The goals of the framework are to: 1) earn public trust and grow public confidence in government systems; 2) to ensure the unique responsibilities and accountabilities (including to the public) of public institutions under Administrative Law are met effectively; and 3) to assure a positive human, societal and ethical impact from the adoption of such systems. The framework could be extended to assure positive environmental or other impacts, but this paper focuses on human/societal outcomes and public trust. This paper is meant to complement principles-based frameworks like Australia's Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework and the EU Assessment List for Trustworthy AI. In many countries, COVID created a bubble of improved trust, a bubble which has arguably already popped, and in an era of unprecedented mistrust of public institutions (but even in times of high trust) it is not enough that a service is faster, or more cost-effective. This paper proposes recommendations for government systems (technology platforms, operations, culture, governance, engagement, etc.) that would help to improve public confidence and trust in public institutions, policies and services, whilst meeting the special obligations and responsibilities of the public sector.
翻译:本文件确定了公共部门系统和程序的机械化、数字化和自动化的当前挑战,并提出了一个现代和实用框架,以确保和确保公共机构的人工情报或自动决策系统具有道德和高度真实性,在澳大利亚的管辖和宪法范围内为公共部门的具体背景设计了这一框架,但可扩展到其他司法管辖区和私营部门。框架的目标是:(1) 赢得公众信任,增强公众对政府系统的信任;(2) 确保有效履行行政法规定的公共机构的独特责任和问责(包括向公众);(3) 确保采用这种系统对人、社会和道德产生积极的影响。该框架可以扩大,以确保积极的环境或其他影响,但本文件侧重于人/社会成果和公众信任。本文件旨在补充澳大利亚的人工情报道德框架和欧盟信用度评估清单等基于原则的框架。在许多国家,COVID创造了信任改善的泡沫,泡沫已经出现,泡沫已经出现,在采用这种体系中,公共信任度越高,公共信任度越高,公共管理体系的运行和工具越高,公众信任度越高,公共信任度越高,公共管理体系越好。