Automated summarization of clinical texts can reduce the burden of medical professionals. "Discharge summaries" are one promising application of the summarization, because they can be generated from daily inpatient records. Our preliminary experiment suggests that 20-31% of the descriptions in discharge summaries overlap with the content of the inpatient records. However, it remains unclear how the summaries should be generated from the unstructured source. To decompose the physician's summarization process, this study aimed to identify the optimal granularity in summarization. We first defined three types of summarization units with different granularities to compare the performance of the discharge summary generation: whole sentences, clinical segments, and clauses. We defined clinical segments in this study, aiming to express the smallest medically meaningful concepts. To obtain the clinical segments, it was necessary to automatically split the texts in the first stage of the pipeline. Accordingly, we compared rule-based methods and a machine learning method, and the latter outperformed the formers with an F1 score of 0.846 in the splitting task. Next, we experimentally measured the accuracy of extractive summarization using the three types of units, based on the ROUGE-1 metric, on a multi-institutional national archive of health records in Japan. The measured accuracies of extractive summarization using whole sentences, clinical segments, and clauses were 31.91, 36.15, and 25.18, respectively. We found that the clinical segments yielded higher accuracy than sentences and clauses. This result indicates that summarization of inpatient records demands finer granularity than sentence-oriented processing. Although we used only Japanese health records, it can be interpreted as follows: physicians extract "concepts of medical significance" from patient records and recombine them ...
翻译:临床文本的自动汇总可以减少医疗专业人员的负担。 “ 开销摘要” 是一个很有希望的概括应用, 因为它们可以从每天的住院记录中产生。 我们的初步实验表明, 20-31%的开销摘要描述与住院记录的内容重叠。 但是, 仍然不清楚应该如何从非结构化的来源中产生摘要。 为了分解医生的总结过程, 本研究旨在找出综合的优化颗粒性。 我们首先定义了三种类型具有不同微粒的汇总单位, 以比较排放摘要生成的绩效: 整个句子、 临床部分和条款。 我们在本研究中定义临床部分, 目的是表达最小的医学意义概念。 为了获取临床部分, 有必要自动地将摘要从非结构化的源中产生。 因此, 我们比较了基于规则的方法和机器学习方法, 后者在分解任务中比前几个阶段的F1分值为0. 846。 其次, 我们用三种临床分类的准确度测量的精确度测量结果测量了91的精确度, 使用日本的多层次记录 。