Face-to-face speech data collection has been next to impossible globally due to COVID-19 restrictions. To address this problem, simultaneous recordings of three repetitions of the cardinal vowels were made using a Zoom H6 Handy Recorder with external microphone (henceforth H6) and compared with two alternatives accessible to potential participants at home: the Zoom meeting application (henceforth Zoom) and two lossless mobile phone applications (Awesome Voice Recorder, and Recorder; henceforth Phone). F0 was tracked accurately by all devices; however, for formant analysis (F1, F2, F3) Phone performed better than Zoom, i.e. more similarly to H6. Zoom recordings also exhibited unexpected drops in intensity. The results suggest that lossless format phone recordings present a viable option for at least some phonetic studies.
翻译:由于COVID-19的限制,收集面对面的语音数据在全球几乎是不可能的。为了解决这个问题,同时用外麦克风(此后为H6)的Zoom H6手动录音机录制了三次重写基调元音的录音,与国内潜在与会者可以使用的两种替代办法相比:缩放会议应用程序(此后为Zoom)和两个无损移动电话应用程序(Aweome语音录音机和录音机;此后为Phone)。所有设备都准确地跟踪了F0;但是,对于形成分析(F1、F2、F3),电话的制作效果比Zoom要好,即更接近H6。 缩放录音的强度也出乎意料地下降。结果显示,无损式电话录音至少为一些语音研究提供了一个可行的选项。