In randomized trials, once the total effect of the intervention has been estimated, it is often of interest to explore mechanistic effects through mediators along the causal pathway between the randomized treatment and the outcome. In the setting with two sequential mediators, there are a variety of decompositions of the total risk difference into mediation effects. We derive sharp and valid bounds for a number of mediation effects in the setting of two sequential mediators both with unmeasured confounding with the outcome. We provide five such bounds in the main text corresponding to two different decompositions of the total effect, as well as the controlled direct effect, with an additional thirty novel bounds provided in the supplementary materials corresponding to the terms of twenty-four four-way decompositions. We also show that, although it may seem that one can produce sharp bounds by adding or subtracting the limits of the sharp bounds for terms in a decomposition, this almost always produces valid, but not sharp bounds that can even be completely noninformative. We investigate the properties of the bounds by simulating random probability distributions under our causal model and illustrate how they are interpreted in a real data example.
翻译:在随机审判中,一旦对干预的总体影响作出估计,通常就有兴趣通过调解人在随机处理和结果之间的因果路径上探索机械效应。在与两个相继调解人的环境下,总的风险差异有各种各样的分解作用。在设定两个相继调解人时,我们为若干调解效果得出了尖锐而有效的界限,两者都与结果混杂不一。我们在主文本中提供了五个这样的界限,对应了两种不同的整体效应分解以及受控制的直接效应,在补充材料中提供了与二十四四向分解条件相对应的另外三十个新的界限。我们还表明,尽管人们似乎可以通过在分解模式中增加或减去临界界限的限度来产生锐利的界限,但这种界限几乎总是有效的,但并不完全不具有信息性。我们通过根据我们的因果模型模拟随机概率分布来调查约束的特性,并展示它们是如何在真实数据中被解释的。