Cybersecurity threat and risk analysis (RA) approaches are used to identify and mitigate security risks early-on in the software development life-cycle. Existing approaches automate only parts of the analysis procedure, leaving key decisions in identification, feasibility and risk analysis, and quality assessment to be determined by expert judgement. Therefore, in practice teams of experts manually analyze the system design by holding brainstorming workshops. Such decisions are made in face of uncertainties, leaving room for biased judgement (e.g., preferential treatment of category of experts). Biased decision making during the analysis may result in unequal contribution of expertise, particularly since some diversity dimensions (i.e., gender) are underrepresented in security teams. Beyond the work of risk perception of non-technical threats, no existing work has empirically studied the role of diversity in the risk analysis of technical artefacts. This paper proposes an experimental plan for identifying the key diversity factors in RA.
翻译:现有办法只使分析程序的某些部分自动化,在识别、可行性和风险分析以及质量评估方面留下关键决定,由专家判断确定;因此,在实践中,专家小组通过举办集思广益讲习班对系统设计进行人工分析;这些决定是在面临不确定性的情况下作出的,为偏见判断留有余地(例如专家类别的优惠待遇);分析过程中的偏差决策可能导致专门知识贡献不均,特别是因为安全小组中存在一些多样性因素(即性别),因此,除了对非技术威胁的风险认识工作外,没有对现有工作经验研究多样性在技术工艺品风险分析中的作用;本文件提出了确定亚美尼亚境内关键多样性因素的实验计划。