Gale-Shapley introduced a matching problem between two sets of agents where each agent on one side has a preference over the agents of the other side and proved algorithmically the existence of a pairwise stable matching (i.e. no uncoupled pair can be better off by matching). Shapley-Shubik, Demange-Gale, and many others extended the model by allowing monetary transfers. In this paper, we study an extension where matched couples obtain their payoffs as the outcome of a strategic game and more particularly a solution concept that combines Gale-Shapley pairwise stability with a constrained Nash equilibrium notion (no player can increase its payoff by playing a different strategy without violating the participation constraint of the partner). Whenever all couples play zero-sum matrix games, strictly competitive bi-matrix games, or infinitely repeated bi-matrix games, we can prove that a modification of some algorithms in the literature converge to an $\varepsilon$-stable allocation in at most $O(\frac{1}{\varepsilon})$ steps where each step is polynomial (linear with respect to the number of players and polynomial of degree at most 5 with respect to the number of pure actions per player).
翻译:Gale-Shapley引入了两组代理商之间的匹配问题,两组代理商中一方的每个代理商都优于另一方的代理商,并在逻辑上证明存在一种对称稳定的匹配(即没有非混合配对可以通过配对更好)。 Shapley-Shubik、Demange-Gale和许多其他代理商都通过允许货币转移来扩展模式。 在本文中,我们研究一个扩展,让一面的代理商在战略游戏的结果中获得报酬,更具体地说,一个解决方案概念,将Gale-Shapley的双向稳定与受限制的纳什平衡概念相结合(任何玩家都无法通过不违反伴侣参与限制的不同策略来增加其报酬 ) 。 当所有夫妇玩零和矩阵游戏, 严格的竞争性双矩阵游戏, 或无限重复的双矩阵游戏, 我们可以证明文学中的某些算法的修改在最多O(frac{1unvarepleislon} 和受限制的纳什平衡概念(任何步骤,而每个步骤都是多级的游戏员人数和每个等级的精度)。