Scientists collaborate through intricate networks, which impact the quality and scope of their research. At the same time, funding and institutional arrangements, as well as scientific and political cultures, affect the structure of collaboration networks. Since such arrangements and cultures differ across regions in the world in systematic ways, we surmise that collaboration networks and impact should also differ systematically across regions. To test this, we compare the structure of collaboration networks among prominent researchers in North America and Europe. We find that prominent researchers in Europe establish denser collaboration networks, whereas those in North-America establish more decentralized networks. We also find that the impact of the publications of prominent researchers in North America is significantly higher than for those in Europe, both when they collaborate with other prominent researchers and when they do not. Although Europeans collaborate with other prominent researchers more often, which increases their impact, we also find that repeated collaboration among prominent researchers decreases the synergistic effect of collaborating.
翻译:科学家通过影响其研究质量和范围的复杂网络进行合作。与此同时,资金和体制安排以及科学和政治文化也影响到合作网络的结构。由于这些安排和文化在世界上各区域之间有系统的方式不同,我们推测协作网络和影响力也应在各区域之间有系统性地不同。为了测试这一点,我们比较北美和欧洲著名研究人员之间协作网络的结构。我们发现,欧洲著名研究人员建立了更为密集的合作网络,而北美的著名研究人员则建立了更为分散的网络。我们还发现,北美著名研究人员的出版物在与其他著名研究人员合作时和没有与其他著名研究人员合作时,其影响大大高于欧洲。尽管欧洲人与其他知名研究人员合作的情况更为频繁,增加了他们的影响,但我们也发现,著名研究人员之间反复进行的合作会减少合作的协同效应。