Multi-objective portfolio optimisation is a critical problem researched across various fields of study as it achieves the objective of maximising the expected return while minimising the risk of a given portfolio at the same time. However, many studies fail to include realistic constraints in the model, which limits practical trading strategies. This study introduces realistic constraints, such as transaction and holding costs, into an optimisation model. Due to the non-convex nature of this problem, metaheuristic algorithms, such as NSGA-II, R-NSGA-II, NSGA-III and U-NSGA-III, will play a vital role in solving the problem. Furthermore, a learnheuristic approach is taken as surrogate models enhance the metaheuristics employed. These algorithms are then compared to the baseline metaheuristic algorithms, which solve a constrained, multi-objective optimisation problem without using learnheuristics. The results of this study show that, despite taking significantly longer to run to completion, the learnheuristic algorithms outperform the baseline algorithms in terms of hypervolume and rate of convergence. Furthermore, the backtesting results indicate that utilising learnheuristics to generate weights for asset allocation leads to a lower risk percentage, higher expected return and higher Sharpe ratio than backtesting without using learnheuristics. This leads us to conclude that using learnheuristics to solve a constrained, multi-objective portfolio optimisation problem produces superior and preferable results than solving the problem without using learnheuristics.
翻译:摘要:多目标组合优化是跨越各研究领域的关键问题,因为它实现了在同时最大化预期收益和最小化给定组合风险的目标。然而,许多研究没有在模型中包含现实约束,这限制了实际交易策略。本研究将现实约束,如交易成本和持有成本,引入到优化模型中。由于这个问题的非凸性,元启发式算法,如NSGA-II、R-NSGA-II、NSGA-III和U-NSGA-III,在解决问题时发挥了关键作用。此外,采用学习启发式方法作为代理模型来增强采用的元启发式算法。然后将这些算法与基准元启发式算法进行比较,基准元算法是在不使用学习启发式的情况下解决约束的多目标优化问题。本研究的结果表明,尽管需要较长的运行时间,但采用学习启发式算法的结果优于不采用学习启发式的基准算法,体现在超体积和收敛速率两方面。此外,回测结果表明,利用学习启发式来生成资产配置权重,导致的风险百分比更低,预期收益更高,夏普比率更高,比不使用学习启发式进行回测效果更好。这使我们得出结论,使用学习启发式解决受约束的多目标优化组合问题,将会产生优越且可取的结果。