This study uses TikTok (N = 8,173) to examine how short-form video platforms challenge the protest paradigm in the recent Black Lives Matter movement. A computer-mediated visual analysis, computer vision, is employed to identify the presence of four visual frames of protest (riot, confrontation, spectacle, and debate) in multimedia content. Results of descriptive statistics and the t-test indicate that the three delegitimizing frames - riot, confrontation, and spectacle - are rarely found on TikTok, whereas the debate frame, that empowers marginalized communities, dominates the public sphere. However, although the three delegitimizing frames receive lower social media visibility, as measured by views, likes, shares, followers, and durations, legitimizing elements, such as the debate frame, minority identities, and unofficial sources, are not generally favored by TikTok audiences. This study concludes that while short-form video platforms could potentially challenge the protest paradigm on the content creators' side, the audiences' preference as measured by social media visibility might still be moderately associated with the protest paradigm.
翻译:该研究利用TikTok (N= 8,173) 来研究短式视频平台如何挑战最近黑人生命物质运动中的抗议模式。 计算机媒介的视觉分析、计算机视觉分析,用于确定多媒体内容中存在四种抗议的视觉框架(暴动、对抗、戏剧和辩论)。 描述性统计数据和t-测试的结果表明,TikTok 很少发现三个非法框架----暴动、对抗和视觉----在TikTok 上,而赋予边缘化社区权力的辩论框架主导着公共领域。 然而,尽管这三个非法化的框架获得较低的社会媒体可见度,如观点、股份、追随者和持续时间衡量,但辩论框架、少数民族身份和非官方来源等合法化要素通常不为TikTok 受众所偏好。 这项研究的结论是,虽然短式视频平台有可能挑战内容创作者的抗议模式,但由社会媒体可见度衡量的受众偏好仍可能与抗议模式略有关联。