This paper presents an original collaborative framework for power exchanges inside a low voltage community. The community seeks to minimize its total costs by scheduling on a daily basis the resources of its members. In this respect, their flexibility such as excess storage capacity, unused local generation or shiftable load are exploited. Total costs include not only the energy commodity, but also grid fees associated to the community operation, through the integration of power flow constraints. In order to share the community costs in a fair manner, two different cost distributions are proposed. The first one adopts a distribution key based on the Shapley value, while the other relies on a natural consensus defined by a Nash equilibrium. Outcomes show that both collaboration schemes lead to important savings for all individual members. In particular, it is observed that the Shapley-based solution gives more value to mobilized flexible resources, whereas the Nash equilibrium rewards the potential flexibility consent of end-users.
翻译:本文介绍了在低电压社区内进行电力交换的原始合作框架。社区通过每天安排其成员的资源,力求尽量减少其总成本。在这方面,利用了它们的灵活性,如超量储存能力、未使用的本地发电或可转移的负荷。总成本不仅包括能源商品,还包括通过整合电力流量限制与社区运营有关的电网费用。为了公平分担社区成本,提出了两种不同的成本分配办法。第一个办法是采用基于Shapley价值的分配钥匙,而另一个则依靠纳什均衡确定的自然共识。结果显示,两种合作计划都为每个成员带来重要的节约。特别是,人们注意到,基于Shapley的解决办法为调动灵活资源提供了更大的价值,而纳什平衡则奖励了最终用户可能同意的灵活性。