Probabilities of causation play a crucial role in modern decision-making. Pearl defined three binary probabilities of causation, the probability of necessity and sufficiency (PNS), the probability of sufficiency (PS), and the probability of necessity (PN). These probabilities were then bounded by Tian and Pearl using a combination of experimental and observational data. However, observational data are not always available in practice; in such a case, Tian and Pearl's Theorem provided valid but less effective bounds using pure experimental data. In this paper, we discuss the conditions that observational data are worth considering to improve the quality of the bounds. More specifically, we defined the expected improvement of the bounds by assuming the observational distributions are uniformly distributed on their feasible interval. We further applied the proposed theorems to the unit selection problem defined by Li and Pearl.
翻译:因果概率在现代决策中起着关键作用。 珍珠界定了三种因果概率、必要性和充足性概率(PNS)、充足性概率(PS)和必要性概率(PN),然后利用实验和观察数据结合使用天珠和珍珠的概率(PN),这些概率被天珠和珍珠捆绑在一起。然而,观测数据在实践上并不总是可用;在这种情况下,天珠和珍珠的理论利用纯实验数据提供了有效但效果较差的界限。我们在本文件中讨论了观测数据值得考虑的提高界限质量的条件。更具体地说,我们界定了假设观测分布在可行的时间间隔内统一分布的界限的预期改进。我们进一步应用了所建议的术语来应对李珍珠确定的单位选择问题。