Statistical analysis of chess games: space control and tipping points

Moves in chess games are usually analyzed on a case-by-case basis by professional players, but thanks to the availability of large game databases, we can envision another approach of the game. Here, we indeed adopt a very different point of view, and analyze moves in chess games from a statistical point of view. We first focus on spatial properties and the location of pieces and show that the number of possible moves during a game is positively correlated with its outcome. We then study heatmaps of pieces and show that the spatial distribution of pieces varies less between human players than with engines (such as Stockfish): engines seem to use pieces in a very different way as human did for centuries. These heatmaps also allow us to construct a distance between players that characterizes how they use their pieces. In a second part, we focus on the best move and the second best move found by Stockfish and study the difference $\Delta$ of their evaluation. We found different regimes during a chess game. In a `quiet' regime, $\Delta$ is small, indicating that many paths are possible for both players. In contrast, there are also `volatile' regimes characterized by a `tipping point', for which $\Delta$ becomes large. At these tipping points, the outcome could then switch completely depending on the move chosen. We also found that for a large number of games, the distribution of $\Delta$ can be fitted by a power law $P(\Delta)\sim \Delta^{-\beta}$ with an exponent that seems to be universal (for human players and engines) and around $\beta\approx 1.8$. The probability to encounter a tipping point in a game is therefore far from being negligible. Finally, we conclude by mentioning possible directions of research for a quantitative understanding of chess games such as the structure of the pawn chain, the interaction graph between pieces, or a quantitative definition of critical points.