On January 1, 2020, California passed the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) by more than 56% of voters intended to enhance privacy rights and consumer protection for residents of California, United States. Since then, more conditions have been added to the Act to support consumers' privacy. In addition, two years after the first effective day of CCPA, consumers have seen California organizations apply approaches to adapt to CCPA. Many organizations quickly upgrade their policy to comply with the legislation and create effective platforms such as data portals that allow consumers to exercise their privacy rights. However, on the other hand, we still noticed aspects of CCPA being absent on some websites. Additionally, we found no prior evaluation of the CCPA implementation in organizations. Therefore, the convergence of the regulatory landscape and the organization's privacy policy needs to be studied. This paper was about an empirical evaluation of the implementation of the California Consumer Privacy Act. The report includes the evaluations of the following industries: social media, financial institutions, mortgages, healthcare providers, and academic institutions. Our approach was to set up a criteria table constructed from the CCPA Act and then use that table as a checklist while reviewing a company's privacy notice. Finally, we concluded this paper with an online tool application design that verifies the CCPA implementation. Upon completion, the application would be free to use so consumers can quickly inspect a website for CCPA compliance. Additionally, it is an advising tool that a website admin can utilize to enhance CCPA compliance for their website. The conjunction of this empirical report and a practical application function as a stimulus to promote CCPA implementation in organizations and deliver awareness to consumers about privacy rights they can demand.
翻译:2020年1月1日,加利福尼亚州56%以上的选民通过了《加利福尼亚州消费者隐私法》(CCPA),目的是加强美国加利福尼亚州居民的隐私权和消费者保护,此后,该法增加了更多支持消费者隐私的条件,此外,在《加利福尼亚州消费者隐私法》生效的第一天两年后,消费者看到加利福尼亚州各组织采用了适应该法的办法,许多组织迅速更新了政策,以遵守立法,并创建了有效平台,如允许消费者行使其隐私权的数据门户等。然而,另一方面,我们还注意到,一些网站上仍然缺少CAPA的一些内容。此外,我们没有发现事先对CAPA实施情况的评估。因此,在《加利福尼亚州消费者隐私法》生效两天后,需要研究监管环境与该组织隐私政策的趋同。此外,这份文件是关于对《加利福尼亚州消费者隐私法》执行情况的实证评价。许多组织都对以下行业进行了评价:社会媒体、金融机构、抵押贷款机构、保健提供者和学术机构。我们的做法是根据CCPA法案建立标准表格,然后将该表格用作一份清单,同时审查公司实施《CCPA》实施情况报告。最后,我们用一份在线文件来更新其网站。