This article interprets emerging scholarship on rental housing platforms -- particularly the most well-known and used short- and long-term rental housing platforms - and considers how the technological processes connecting both short-term and long-term rentals to the platform economy are transforming cities. It discusses potential policy approaches to more equitably distribute benefits and mitigate harms. We argue that information technology is not value-neutral. While rental housing platforms may empower data analysts and certain market participants, the same cannot be said for all users or society at large. First, user-generated online data frequently reproduce the systematic biases found in traditional sources of housing information. Evidence is growing that the information broadcasting potential of rental housing platforms may increase rather than mitigate sociospatial inequality. Second, technology platforms curate and shape information according to their creators' own financial and political interests. The question of which data -- and people -- are hidden or marginalized on these platforms is just as important as the question of which data are available. Finally, important differences in benefits and drawbacks exist between short-term and long-term rental housing platforms, but are underexplored in the literature: this article unpacks these differences and proposes policy recommendations.
翻译:本条解释出租住房平台上新出现的奖学金 -- -- 特别是最著名和最常用的短期和长期租赁住房平台 -- -- 并考虑将短期和长期租赁与平台经济联系起来的技术进程如何正在改变城市。它讨论了更公平地分配福利和减轻伤害的潜在政策办法。我们争辩说,信息技术不是价值中立的。虽然出租住房平台可能赋予数据分析员和某些市场参与者以权力,但对于所有用户或整个社会来说,情况并非如此。首先,用户生成的在线数据经常重复传统住房信息来源中发现的系统性偏见。越来越多的证据表明,出租住房平台的信息广播潜力可能增加,而不是减轻社会空间不平等。第二,技术平台根据创造者自身的财政和政治利益整理和塑造信息。这些平台上哪些数据 -- -- 以及哪些人 -- -- 被隐藏或边缘化的问题与提供哪些数据的问题同样重要。最后,短期和长期租赁住房平台之间的惠益和缺陷存在重大差异,但在文献中却没有得到充分探讨:这篇文章揭示了这些差异并提出政策建议。