We investigate the problem of fair recommendation in the context of two-sided online platforms, comprising customers on one side and producers on the other. Traditionally, recommendation services in these platforms have focused on maximizing customer satisfaction by tailoring the results according to the personalized preferences of individual customers. However, our investigation reveals that such customer-centric design may lead to unfair distribution of exposure among the producers, which may adversely impact their well-being. On the other hand, a producer-centric design might become unfair to the customers. Thus, we consider fairness issues that span both customers and producers. Our approach involves a novel mapping of the fair recommendation problem to a constrained version of the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods. Our proposed FairRec algorithm guarantees at least Maximin Share (MMS) of exposure for most of the producers and Envy-Free up to One item (EF1) fairness for every customer. Extensive evaluations over multiple real-world datasets show the effectiveness of FairRec in ensuring two-sided fairness while incurring a marginal loss in the overall recommendation quality.
翻译:我们的调查发现,这种以客户为中心的设计可能会导致生产者之间风险的不公平分布,这可能会对其福祉产生不利影响。另一方面,以生产者为中心的设计可能会对客户产生不公平的影响。因此,我们认为公平问题既涉及消费者,也涉及生产者。我们的方法是,对公平建议问题进行新颖的描述,将公平建议问题描述为公平分配不可分割货物的有限版本。我们提议的公平算法至少保证大多数生产者接触马克西宁股份(MMS),并且保证每个消费者都能公平享受一个项目。对多个真实世界数据集的广泛评价表明公平公司在确保双向公平同时在整体建议质量上造成微小损失方面的效力。