At a national-level, we sought to investigate the effect of public masking mandates on COVID-19 in Fall 2020. Specifically, we aimed to evaluate how the relative growth of COVID-19 cases and deaths would have differed if all states had issued a mandate to mask in public by September 1, 2020 versus if all states had delayed issuing such a mandate. To do so, we applied the Causal Roadmap, a formal framework for causal and statistical inference. The outcome was defined as the state-specific relative increase in cumulative cases and in cumulative deaths {21, 30, 45, 60}-days after September 1. Despite the natural experiment in state-level masking policies, the causal effect of interest was not identifiable. Nonetheless, we specified the target statistical parameter as the adjusted rate ratio (aRR): the expected outcome with early implementation divided by the expected outcome with delayed implementation, after adjusting for state-level confounders. To minimize strong estimation assumptions, primary analyses used targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) with Super Learner. After 60-days and at a national-level, early implementation was associated 9% reduction in new COVID-19 cases (aRR: 0.91; 95%CI: 0.88-0.95) and a 16% reduction in new COVID-19 deaths (aRR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.76-0.93). Although lack of identifiability prohibited causal interpretations, application of the Causal Roadmap facilitated estimation and inference of statistical associations, providing timely answers to pressing questions in the COVID-19 response.
翻译:具体地说,我们旨在评估如果所有国家在9月1日之前公开发布掩盖任务的任务,或者如果所有国家推迟发布这一任务,那么2020年9月1日公开掩盖任务对2020年秋季COVID-19的影响。我们在国家一级试图调查公共掩盖任务对2020年秋季COVID-19的影响。具体地说,我们旨在评估如果所有国家在2020年9月1日前发布公开掩盖任务的任务,那么COVID-19案件和死亡人数的相对增长会如何不同,而如果所有国家推迟发布这一任务,我们则将评估。为了这样做,我们采用了因果和统计推理的正式框架,即“因果路线图”,结果被定义为:在累积案件和累计和累计解算中,累积案例的累积和累计解算中,国家比例相对相对增加 {21,30,45,60天后,60天之后的累计解答。尽管在州级掩码政策中进行了自然实验,但利息的因果关系是无法辨别的。然而,我们指定了目标统计参数为调整比率(aRRR):根据预期结果,早期执行的结果与预期结果有差别,而执行结果则因州级的延迟;为了尽量减少估计,用最有可能估计(TMIRCFI),60天后,采用新的COVI19的死亡率为:0.80-19案例减少9%)。