Scientific understanding is a fundamental goal of science, allowing us to explain the world. There is currently no good way to measure the scientific understanding of agents, whether these be humans or Artificial Intelligence systems. Without a clear benchmark, it is challenging to evaluate and compare different levels of and approaches to scientific understanding. In this Roadmap, we propose a framework to create a benchmark for scientific understanding, utilizing tools from philosophy of science. We adopt a behavioral notion according to which genuine understanding should be recognized as an ability to perform certain tasks. We extend this notion by considering a set of questions that can gauge different levels of scientific understanding, covering information retrieval, the capability to arrange information to produce an explanation, and the ability to infer how things would be different under different circumstances. The Scientific Understanding Benchmark (SUB), which is formed by a set of these tests, allows for the evaluation and comparison of different approaches. Benchmarking plays a crucial role in establishing trust, ensuring quality control, and providing a basis for performance evaluation. By aligning machine and human scientific understanding we can improve their utility, ultimately advancing scientific understanding and helping to discover new insights within machines.
翻译:科学理解是科学的根本目标,它让我们能够解释世界。目前还没有一种好的方法来衡量机器或人类智能系统的科学理解水平。缺乏清晰的基准,很难评估和比较不同水平的和不同方法的科学理解。在本路线图中,我们提出了一个框架,以哲学科学工具为基础,创建科学理解基准。我们采用一种行为性概念,根据这种概念,真正的理解应该被认为是执行某些任务的能力。我们通过考虑一组问题,扩展了这种概念,这些问题可以衡量不同水平的科学理解,包括信息检索、能够整理信息以产生解释的能力,以及在不同情况下推断事物会有怎样不同的能力。科学理解基准 (SUB)由这些测试组成,可以评估和比较不同的方法。标准化在建立信任、确保质量控制和提供性能评估基础方面起着至关重要的作用。通过使机器和人类的科学理解相一致,我们可以提高它们的效用,最终推进科学理解,帮助发现机器内的新见解。