A common concern when a policymaker draws causal inferences from and makes decisions based on observational data is that the measured covariates are insufficiently rich to account for all sources of confounding, i.e., the standard no confoundedness assumption fails to hold. The recently proposed proximal causal inference framework shows that proxy variables can be leveraged to identify causal effects and therefore facilitate decision-making. Building upon this line of work, we propose a novel optimal individualized treatment regime based on so-called outcome-inducing and treatment-inducing confounding bridges. We then show that the value function of this new optimal treatment regime is superior to that of existing ones in the literature. Theoretical guarantees, including identification, superiority, and excess value bound of the estimated regime, are established. Furthermore, we demonstrate the proposed optimal regime via numerical experiments and a real data application.
翻译:当决策者从观察数据中得出因果推论并作出决定时,一个共同的关切是,所测量的共变体不够丰富,无法说明所有混淆来源,即标准、无根据假设不能成立。最近提议的准因果推论框架表明,可以利用代理变量来确定因果影响,从而便利决策。在这项工作的基础上,我们提议以所谓的成果产生和治疗促成混淆的桥梁为基础,建立一个新的最佳个人化处理制度。然后,我们表明,这一新的最佳处理制度的价值作用高于文献中的现有制度。确立了理论保证,包括确认、优越性和估计制度所涉的超额价值。此外,我们通过数字实验和真实的数据应用,展示了拟议的最佳制度。