A human-swarm cooperative system, which mixes multiple robots and a human supervisor to form a heterogeneous team, is widely used for emergent scenarios such as criminal tracking in social security and victim assistance in a natural disaster. These emergent scenarios require a cooperative team to quickly terminate the current task and transit the system to a new task, bringing difficulty in motion planning. Moreover, due to the immediate task transitions, uncertainty from both physical systems and prior tasks is accumulated to decrease swarm performance, causing robot failures and influencing the cooperation effectiveness between the human and the robot swarm. Therefore, given the quick-transition requirements and the introduced uncertainty, it is challenging for a human-swarm system to respond to emergent tasks, compared with executing normal tasks where a gradual transition between tasks is allowed. Human trust reveals the behavior expectations of others and is used to adjust unsatisfactory behaviors for better cooperation. Inspired by human trust, in this paper, a trust-aware reflective control (Trust-R) is developed to dynamically calibrate human-swarm cooperation. Trust-R, based on a weighted mean subsequence reduced algorithm (WMSR) and human trust modeling, helps a swarm to self-reflect its performance from the perspective of human trust; then proactively correct its faulty behaviors in an early stage before a human intervenes. One typical task scenario {emergency response} was designed in the real-gravity simulation environment, and a human user study with 145 volunteers was conducted. Trust-R's effectiveness in correcting faulty behaviors in emergency response was validated by the improved swarm performance and increased trust scores.
翻译:人类暖化合作系统混合了多个机器人和人类监督员,组成了一个多样化团队。 因此,鉴于快速过渡要求和引入的不确定性,人类暖化系统很难应对突发任务,而执行正常任务,允许任务之间逐步过渡。 人类信任揭示了他人的行为期望,并用于调整不满意的行为,以加强合作。 人类信任,在本文中,通过信心,建立具有反射力的控制(Trust-R),动态地校准了人类与机器人暖化之间的反应。 信任-R基于一种加权的深层次的错误分析,在人类的周期中,在人类的周期中,通过人为的周期性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断性判断