We present Queer in AI as a case study for community-led participatory design in AI. We examine how participatory design and intersectional tenets started and shaped this community's programs over the years. We discuss different challenges that emerged in the process, look at ways this organization has fallen short of operationalizing participatory and intersectional principles, and then assess the organization's impact. Queer in AI provides important lessons and insights for practitioners and theorists of participatory methods broadly through its rejection of hierarchy in favor of decentralization, success at building aid and programs by and for the queer community, and effort to change actors and institutions outside of the queer community. Finally, we theorize how communities like Queer in AI contribute to the participatory design in AI more broadly by fostering cultures of participation in AI, welcoming and empowering marginalized participants, critiquing poor or exploitative participatory practices, and bringing participation to institutions outside of individual research projects. Queer in AI's work serves as a case study of grassroots activism and participatory methods within AI, demonstrating the potential of community-led participatory methods and intersectional praxis, while also providing challenges, case studies, and nuanced insights to researchers developing and using participatory methods.
翻译:我们以 Queer in AI 作为社区参与式 AI 設計案例研究。我们探讨了基本法和交叉性誓言在这个社区的项目中如何启动和塑造。我们讨论了在过程中出现的不同挑战,看看这个组织如何未能在行动和交叉原则中落实参与式程序,并评估了该组织的影响。Queer in AI 通过拒绝层次制度而支持去中心化,努力为酷儿群体构建工具和项目,并尝试改变酷儿团体以外的参与者和机构,向从 AI 的参与文化贡献中为广泛研究者提供重要的教训和规范。最后,我们理论化讨论了如何被 Queer in AI 这样的社区为 AI 全面参与報道做出了贡献,包括在 AI 中鼓励参与文化,欢迎和赋权被其它研究项目排斥的群体,审查不充分或剥削性参与实践,并将参与引入独立研究项目之外的机构。Queer in AI 的工作作为基层活动和社区参与方法在 AI 中体现,不仅展示了社区参与式方式和交叉战理念的潜力,还为开发和使用参与方式的研究者提供了挑战、案例和细致的见解。