An important parameter for COVID-19 is the case fatality rate (CFR). It has been applied to wide applications, including the measure of the severity of the infection, the estimation of the number of infected cases, risk assessment etc. However, there remains a lack of understanding on several aspects of CFR, including population factors that are important to CFR, the apparent discrepancy of CFRs in different countries, and how the age effect comes into play. We analyze the CFRs at two different time snapshots, July 6 and Dec 28, 2020, with one during the first wave and the other a second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We consider two important population covariates, age and GDP as a proxy for the quality and abundance of public health. Extensive exploratory data analysis leads to some interesting findings. First, there is a clear exponential age effect among different age groups, and, more importantly, the exponential index is almost invariant across countries and time in the pandemic. Second, the roles played by the age and GDP are a little surprising: during the first wave, age is a more significant factor than GDP, while their roles have switched during the second wave of the pandemic, which may be partially explained by the delay in time for the quality and abundance of public health and medical research to factor in.
翻译:COVID-19的一个重要参数是病例死亡率(CFR),该参数被广泛应用于广泛的应用,包括衡量感染的严重程度、估计感染病例数量、风险评估等。然而,对于CVID-19的多个方面仍然缺乏了解,包括对CVID-19很重要的人口因素,不同国家的CVID-19明显差异,以及年龄影响如何发挥作用。我们用两种不同时间的快照(7月6日和2020年12月28日)分析了CFR,第一波和第二波COVID-19大流行病。我们认为,两种重要的人口变异、年龄和国内生产总值是公共卫生质量和丰度的替代物。广泛的探索性数据分析导致一些有趣的发现。首先,不同年龄组之间的年龄变化明显,更重要的是,指数几乎是各国和流行病时期的变异性。第二,年龄和国内生产总值的作用是不足的:在第一波中,年龄比COVID-19大流行病的第二波要重要,而年龄和国内生产总值是比GDP更重要的因素,而它们在第二波期间的医学质量和医学程度的延迟作用可能部分被解释。