Data associations in multi-target multi-camera tracking (MTMCT) usually estimate affinity directly from re-identification (re-ID) feature distances. However, we argue that it might not be the best choice given the difference in matching scopes between re-ID and MTMCT problems. Re-ID systems focus on global matching, which retrieves targets from all cameras and all times. In contrast, data association in tracking is a local matching problem, since its candidates only come from neighboring locations and time frames. In this paper, we design experiments to verify such misfit between global re-ID feature distances and local matching in tracking, and propose a simple yet effective approach to adapt affinity estimations to corresponding matching scopes in MTMCT. Instead of trying to deal with all appearance changes, we tailor the affinity metric to specialize in ones that might emerge during data associations. To this end, we introduce a new data sampling scheme with temporal windows originally used for data associations in tracking. Minimizing the mismatch, the adaptive affinity module brings significant improvements over global re-ID distance, and produces competitive performance on CityFlow and DukeMTMC datasets.
翻译:多目标多镜头跟踪数据协会(MTMCT)通常从再识别(再识别)特征距离直接估计亲近性。然而,我们认为,鉴于再识别和MTMCT问题在匹配范围上的差异,它可能不是最佳选择。再识别系统侧重于全球匹配,从所有摄像头和所有时间中检索目标。相反,数据联系跟踪是一个本地匹配问题,因为其候选人仅来自相邻地点和时间框架。在本文中,我们设计了实验,以核实全球再识别特征距离和跟踪中本地匹配之间的这种误差,并提出一种简单而有效的方法,使亲近性估计适应MTMCT的相应匹配范围。我们不是试图处理所有外观变化,而是调整这种亲近性衡量标准,以便专门处理数据组合期间可能出现的变化。为此,我们引入了一个新的数据取样方案,即使用时间窗口,最初用于数据联系跟踪。缩小不匹配,适应性模模模模模块对全球再识别距离做出重大改进,并产生城市Flow和DukMMC数据集的竞争性性表现。