Capturing the uncertainty in probabilistic wind power forecasts is challenging, especially when uncertain input variables, such as the weather, play a role. Since ensemble weather predictions aim to capture the uncertainty in the weather system, they can be used to propagate this uncertainty through to subsequent wind power forecasting models. However, as weather ensemble systems are known to be biased and underdispersed, meteorologists post-process the ensembles. This post-processing can successfully correct the biases in the weather variables but has not been evaluated thoroughly in the context of subsequent forecasts, such as wind power generation forecasts. The present paper evaluates multiple strategies for applying ensemble post-processing to probabilistic wind power forecasts. We use Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS) as the post-processing method and evaluate four possible strategies: only using the raw ensembles without post-processing, a one-step strategy where only the weather ensembles are post-processed, a one-step strategy where we only post-process the power ensembles, and a two-step strategy where we post-process both the weather and power ensembles. Results show that post-processing the final wind power ensemble improves forecast performance regarding both calibration and sharpness, whilst only post-processing the weather ensembles does not necessarily lead to increased forecast performance.
翻译:测算概率性风能预测的不确定性具有挑战性,特别是在天气等不确定的投入变量发挥作用的情况下。由于混合天气预测旨在捕捉天气系统的不确定性,因此这些预测可以用来通过随后的风能预测模型传播这种不确定性。然而,由于已知天气混合系统有偏向,而且分布不足,气象学家在对集合进行处理后就使用气象元件。这一后处理能够成功地纠正天气变量中的偏差,但在随后的预测(如风能发电预测)中却未能进行彻底评估。本文件评估了将混合后处理用于概率性风能预测的多种战略。我们使用混合模型输出统计作为后处理方法,并评价了四种可能的战略:仅使用原始集合而不经过后处理的气象学家处理后处理,这种一步骤战略只对气象变量进行后处理,而我们仅对后处理电源组合进行彻底评价,而我们仅对后处理后处理后处理后变电处理后变速后变速率进行两次步骤战略,而后处理后再进行后处理后再进行最后一步战略,而我们不至后处理后再进行风能变整后变整的天气和变后结果,结果只能显示不断变整后的结果。