Many online platforms today (such as Amazon, Netflix, Spotify, LinkedIn, and AirBnB) can be thought of as two-sided markets with producers and customers of goods and services. Traditionally, recommendation services in these platforms have focused on maximizing customer satisfaction by tailoring the results according to the personalized preferences of individual customers. However, our investigation reinforces the fact that such customer-centric design of these services may lead to unfair distribution of exposure to the producers, which may adversely impact their well-being. On the other hand, a pure producer-centric design might become unfair to the customers. As more and more people are depending on such platforms to earn a living, it is important to ensure fairness to both producers and customers. In this work, by mapping a fair personalized recommendation problem to a constrained version of the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods, we propose to provide fairness guarantees for both sides. Formally, our proposed {\em FairRec} algorithm guarantees Maxi-Min Share ($\alpha$-MMS) of exposure for the producers, and Envy-Free up to One Item (EF1) fairness for the customers. Extensive evaluations over multiple real-world datasets show the effectiveness of {\em FairRec} in ensuring two-sided fairness while incurring a marginal loss in overall recommendation quality. Finally, we present a modification of FairRec (named as FairRecPlus) that at the cost of additional computation time, improves the recommendation performance for the customers, while maintaining the same fairness guarantees.
翻译:今天,许多在线平台(如亚马逊、Netflix、Spotify、Spotify、LinkedIn和AirBnB)可以被视为与商品和服务生产者和客户的双面市场。传统上,这些平台的建议服务侧重于通过根据个别客户的个人偏好来调整结果,最大限度地提高客户的满意度。然而,我们的调查强化了这样的服务以客户为中心的设计可能导致向生产者不公平地分配风险,这可能对其福祉产生不利影响。另一方面,纯粹的以生产者为中心的设计可能变得对客户不公平。随着越来越多的人依赖这种平台谋生,确保公平对待生产者和客户非常重要。在这项工作中,通过将公平的个性化建议问题描述为公平分配不可分割货物的有限版本,我们提议为双方提供公平保障。形式上,我们提议的“公平”算法保证了最大程度的麦基-米瑞($alfay-MMS)对生产者的曝光量,而Envy-lefer toone (EF1)对客户来说是靠这种平台谋生谋生的,因此必须确保对生产者和客户的公平性。在公平性方面进行公平的评估,最后,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性评估中,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性建议中,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性评估中,在公平性方面,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性方面,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性方面,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性方面,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性上,在公平性上,我们性上,我们性上,在公平性上,在