With modern infotainment systems, drivers are increasingly tempted to engage in secondary tasks while driving. Since distracted driving is already one of the main causes of fatal accidents, in-vehicle touchscreen Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs) must be as little distracting as possible. To ensure that these systems are safe to use, they undergo elaborate and expensive empirical testing, requiring fully functional prototypes. Thus, early-stage methods informing designers about the implication their design may have on driver distraction are of great value. This paper presents a machine learning method that, based on anticipated usage scenarios, predicts the visual demand of in-vehicle touchscreen interactions and provides local and global explanations of the factors influencing drivers' visual attention allocation. The approach is based on large-scale natural driving data continuously collected from production line vehicles and employs the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method to provide explanations leveraging informed design decisions. Our approach is more accurate than related work and identifies interactions during which long glances occur with 68 % accuracy and predicts the total glance duration with a mean error of 2.4 s. Our explanations replicate the results of various recent studies and provide fast and easily accessible insights into the effect of UI elements, driving automation, and vehicle speed on driver distraction. The system can not only help designers to evaluate current designs but also help them to better anticipate and understand the implications their design decisions might have on future designs.
翻译:由于现代的信息技术系统,驾驶者越来越倾向于在驾驶时从事次要任务。由于分心驾驶已经是致命事故的主要原因之一,因此车辆内触摸屏人类-海洋界面(HIMS)必须尽量少分散注意力。为了确保这些系统安全使用,他们要经过精心和昂贵的经验测试,需要完全功能化的原型。因此,让设计者了解其设计对驱动器分散注意力的影响的早期方法具有巨大价值。本文件介绍了一种机器学习方法,根据预期使用情景预测车辆触摸屏互动的视觉需求,并对影响司机视觉注意力分配的因素提供当地和全球的解释。这种方法的基础是从生产线车辆不断收集的大型自然驾驶数据,并采用SHapley Appitive Expression (SHAP) 方法,以利用知情的设计决定提供解释。我们的方法比相关工作更准确,并查明长期观察期间的相互作用,其准确率为68 %,预测全透视时间,平均为2.4秒。我们的解释复制了最近各种研究的结果,对驱动器注意的注意力分配进行快速和容易理解的预测。我们的解释可能无法对当前汽车的驱动力进行更迅速和可理解的预测。