We introduce a new multiple type I error criterion for clinical trials with multiple populations. Such trials are of interest in precision medicine where the goal is to develop treatments that are targeted to specific sub-populations defined by genetic and/or clinical biomarkers. The new criterion is based on the observation that not all type I errors are relevant to all patients in the overall population. If disjoint sub-populations are considered, no multiplicity adjustment appears necessary, since a claim in one sub-population does not affect patients in the other ones. For intersecting sub-populations we suggest to control the average multiple type error rate, i.e. the probably that a randomly selected patient will be exposed to an inefficient treatment. We call this the population-wise error rate, exemplify it by a number of examples and illustrate how to control it with an adjustment of critical boundaries or adjusted p-values. We furthermore define corresponding simultaneous confidence intervals. We finally illustrate the power gain achieved by passing from family-wise to population-wise error rate control with two simple examples and a recently suggest multiple testing approach for umbrella trials.
翻译:我们为多种人群的临床试验引入了一种新的多种类型I错误标准。这种试验对精确医学感兴趣,其目标是针对基因和/或临床生物标记所定义的特定亚群体进行治疗。新的标准基于这样的观察,即并非所有的第一类错误都与总人口中的所有患者相关。如果考虑到分人口脱节,则似乎没有必要进行多重调整,因为在一个亚群体中的主张并不影响其他人群的患者。对于相互交错的亚群体,我们建议控制平均多类型错误率,即随机选择的患者可能暴露于效率低下的治疗中。我们称之为人口错误率,用几个例子加以举例说明,说明如何通过调整临界界限或调整 p价值来控制它。我们进一步界定相应的同时信任间隔。我们最后用两个简单的例子说明从家庭角度向人口偏差率控制转变而获得的能量。我们建议对总括试验采用多种测试方法。