With advancements in computer vision taking place day by day, recently a lot of light is being shed on activity recognition. With the range for real-world applications utilizing this field of study increasing across a multitude of industries such as security and healthcare, it becomes crucial for businesses to distinguish which machine learning methods perform better than others in the area. This paper strives to aid in this predicament i.e. building upon previous related work, it employs both classical and ensemble approaches on rich pose estimation (OpenPose) and HAR datasets. Making use of appropriate metrics to evaluate the performance for each model, the results show that overall, random forest yields the highest accuracy in classifying ADLs. Relatively all the models have excellent performance across both datasets, except for logistic regression and AdaBoost perform poorly in the HAR one. With the limitations of this paper also discussed in the end, the scope for further research is vast, which can use this paper as a base in aims of producing better results.
翻译:随着计算机愿景的发展日复一日地发生,最近大量亮光正在展示活动识别。随着利用这个研究领域的实际应用范围在安全和医疗保健等多种行业中不断增长,企业必须区分哪些机器学习方法比该领域其他行业表现更好。本文件努力帮助克服这一困境,即在以往相关工作的基础上,对丰富(OpenPose)和HAR数据集采用传统和共同方法。利用适当的指标来评价每个模型的性能,结果显示,总体而言,随机森林在对ADLs进行分类方面产生最高准确性。相对而言,所有模型在这两个数据集中都具有良好的性能,但后勤回归和AdaBoost在HAR 1中表现不佳除外。由于本文的局限性也在最后讨论,进一步研究的范围很广,可以用该文件作为基础,以便产生更好的结果。