We describe and contrast two distinct problem areas for statistical causality: studying the likely effects of an intervention ("effects of causes"), and studying whether there is a causal link between the observed exposure and outcome in an individual case ("causes of effects"). For each of these, we introduce and compare various formal frameworks that have been proposed for that purpose, including the decision-theoretic approach, structural equations, structural and stochastic causal models, and potential outcomes. It is argued that counterfactual concepts are unnecessary for studying effects of causes, but are needed for analysing causes of effects. They are however subject to a degree of arbitrariness, which can be reduced, though not in general eliminated, by taking account of additional structure in the problem.
翻译:我们描述和比较了统计因果关系的两个截然不同的问题领域:研究干预的可能效果(“原因的影响 ” ), 研究观察到的暴露和单个案例的结果(“效应的原因 ” ) 之间是否存在因果关系。 对于其中每一个领域,我们引入并比较了为此提出的各种正式框架,包括决策理论方法、结构方程、结构性和随机性因果关系模型以及潜在结果。 有人认为,反事实概念对于研究原因的影响是不必要的,而对于分析影响的原因则需要反事实概念。 然而,这些概念具有一定程度的任意性,但可以通过考虑到问题的额外结构来减少这种任意性,尽管一般不是消除这种任意性。