Vagueness and ambiguity in privacy policies threaten the ability of consumers to make informed choices about how businesses collect, use, and share their personal information. The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) of 2018 was intended to provide Californian consumers with more control by mandating that businesses (1) clearly disclose their data practices and (2) provide choices for consumers to opt out of specific data practices. In this work, we explore to what extent CCPA's disclosure requirements, as implemented in actual privacy policies, can help consumers to answer questions about the data practices of businesses. First, we analyzed 95 privacy policies from popular websites; our findings showed that there is considerable variance in how businesses interpret CCPA's definitions. Then, our user survey of 364 Californian consumers showed that this variance affects the ability of users to understand the data practices of businesses. Our results suggest that CCPA's mandates for privacy disclosures, as currently implemented, have not yet yielded the level of clarity they were designed to deliver, due to both vagueness and ambiguity in CCPA itself as well as potential non-compliance by businesses in their privacy policies.
翻译:2018年《加利福尼亚消费者隐私法》旨在通过强制规定企业(1) 明确披露其数据做法和(2) 为消费者选择退出具体数据做法提供选择;在这项工作中,我们探索在实际隐私政策中执行的CAP的披露要求在多大程度上有助于消费者回答有关企业数据做法的问题。首先,我们从受欢迎的网站分析了95项隐私政策;我们的调查结果表明,企业解释CAP定义的方式存在很大差异。 然后,我们对364个加利福尼亚消费者的用户调查表明,这一差异影响到用户理解企业数据做法的能力。 我们的结果表明,由于CAPA本身含糊不清和含糊不清,以及企业在隐私政策中可能出现不合规情况,CAPA的隐私披露任务目前已经落实,但尚未达到其设计要达到的清晰度。