Recommender systems are an essential tool to relieve the information overload challenge and play an important role in people's daily lives. Since recommendations involve allocations of social resources (e.g., job recommendation), an important issue is whether recommendations are fair. Unfair recommendations are not only unethical but also harm the long-term interests of the recommender system itself. As a result, fairness issues in recommender systems have recently attracted increasing attention. However, due to multiple complex resource allocation processes and various fairness definitions, the research on fairness in recommendation is scattered. To fill this gap, we review over 60 papers published in top conferences/journals, including TOIS, SIGIR, and WWW. First, we summarize fairness definitions in the recommendation and provide several views to classify fairness issues. Then, we review recommendation datasets and measurements in fairness studies and provide an elaborate taxonomy of fairness methods in the recommendation. Finally, we conclude this survey by outlining some promising future directions.
翻译:咨询系统是缓解信息超载挑战、在人们日常生活中发挥重要作用的重要工具,因为建议涉及社会资源的分配(例如工作建议),因此,一个重要问题是建议是否公平。不公正的建议不仅不道德,而且损害建议系统本身的长期利益。因此,建议系统中的公平问题最近引起越来越多的注意。然而,由于资源分配程序复杂多样,定义公平性研究分散,建议中的公平性研究也分散。为了填补这一空白,我们审查了在包括TOIS、SIGIR和WWWW在内的高级会议/期刊上发表的60多篇论文。首先,我们总结了建议中的公平性定义,并提出了对公平问题进行分类的若干观点。然后,我们审查了公平研究中的建议数据集和衡量方法,并在建议中提供了详细的公平方法分类。最后,我们通过概述一些有希望的未来方向来结束这一调查。