Using theoretical and numerical results, we document the accuracy of commonly applied variational Bayes methods across a broad range of state space models. The results demonstrate that, in terms of accuracy on fixed parameters, there is a clear hierarchy in terms of the methods, with approaches that do not approximate the states yielding superior accuracy over methods that do. We also document numerically that the inferential discrepancies between the various methods often yield only small discrepancies in predictive accuracy over small out-of-sample evaluation periods. Nevertheless, in certain settings, these predictive discrepancies can become marked over longer out-of-sample periods. This finding indicates that the invariance of predictive results to inferential inaccuracy, which has been an oft-touted point made by practitioners seeking to justify the use of variational inference, is not ubiquitous and must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
翻译:使用理论和数字结果,我们记录了在一系列广泛的国家空间模型中通用的变异贝耶斯方法的准确性。结果显示,从固定参数的准确性看,在方法上存在着明确的等级分级,其方法不近于国家产生优于方法的准确性。我们还用数字来证明,不同方法之间的推论差异往往只产生小范围的超出抽样评价期的预测准确性差异。然而,在某些环境下,这些预测性差异可能会在较长的抽样期中出现。这一发现表明,预测结果的偏差导致推断的不准确性,而实践者试图证明使用变异推断是有道理的,但这种预测性差异并非无处不在,必须逐案评估。