We present a scenario in $1 + 1$ and $3 + 1$ dimensional space time which is paradoxical in the presence of a time machine. We show that the paradox cannot be resolved and the scenario has {\em no} consistent classical solution. Since the system is macroscopic, quantisation is unlikely to resolve the paradox. Moreover, in the absence of a consistent classical solution to a macroscopic system, it is not obvious how to carry out the path integral quantisation. Ruling out, by fiat, the troublesome initial conditions will resolve the paradox, by not giving rise to it in the first place. However this implies that time machines have an influence on events, extending indefinitely into the past, and also tachyonic communication between physical events in an era when no time machine existed. If no resolution to the paradox can be found, the logical conclusion is that time machines of a certain, probably large, class cannot exist in $3 + 1$ and $1 + 1$ dimensional space time, maintaining the consistency of known physical laws.
翻译:我们提出了一个1+1美元和3+1美元的维维空间时的假想,在有一台时机的情况下,这种假想是自相矛盾的。我们表明,悖论无法解决,而这种假想具有一贯的古典解决办法。由于这个系统是宏观的,量化不可能解决这个矛盾。此外,如果宏观系统没有一贯的经典解决办法,那么,如何执行这个整体量化的方法并不明显。通过直截了当地将麻烦的初始条件解决这个矛盾,首先不会引起它。然而,这意味着时间机器对事件有影响,无限期地延伸到过去,而且在没有时间机器的时代里,物理事件之间也存在微小的沟通。如果无法找到解决这个矛盾的办法,逻辑结论是,某一类(可能很大)的时间机器不可能存在3+1美元和1+1美元的维维空间时间,从而保持已知的实际法律的一致性。