As a part of science of science (SciSci) research, the evolution of scientific disciplines has been attracting a great deal of attention recently. This kind of discipline level analysis not only give insights of one particular field but also shed light on general principles of scientific enterprise. In this paper we focus on graphene research, a fast growing field covers both theoretical and applied study. Using co-clustering method, we split graphene literature into two groups and confirm that one group is about theoretical research (T) and another corresponds to applied research (A). We analyze the proportion of T/A and found applied research becomes more and more popular after 2007. Geographical analysis demonstrated that countries have different preference in terms of T/A and they reacted differently to research trend. The interaction between two groups has been analyzed and shows that T extremely relies on T and A heavily relies on A, however the situation is very stable for T but changed markedly for A. No geographic difference is found for the interaction dynamics. Our results give a comprehensive picture of graphene research evolution and also provide a general framework which is able to analyze other disciplines.
翻译:作为科学(SciSci)研究的一部分,科学学科的演进最近引起了人们的极大关注。这种学科级分析不仅揭示了某一特定领域,而且也揭示了科学企业的一般原则。在这份文件中,我们侧重于石墨研究,一个迅速增长的领域涵盖理论和应用研究。我们使用联合集群方法,将石墨文献分为两个组,确认一个组涉及理论研究(T),另一个组与应用研究(A)相对应。我们分析了2007年以后T/A和发现的应用研究的比例越来越受欢迎。我们的地理分析表明,各国在T/A方面有不同的偏好,它们对研究趋势的反应也不同。对两个组之间的相互作用进行了分析,并表明T和A高度依赖A,但T的情况非常稳定,但A的情况发生了显著变化。互动动态没有发现任何地理差异。我们的结果全面描绘了石墨研究的演变过程,并且提供了能够分析其他学科的一般框架。