Policy makers are interested in the influence of geographic distance on knowledge flows, however these can be expected to vary across research fields. The effects of geographic distance on flows are analyzed by means of citations to scientific literature. The field of observation consists of the 2010-2012 Italian publications and relevant citations up to the close of 2017. The geographic proximity effect is analyzed at national, continental, and intercontinental level in 244 fields, and results as evident at national level and in some cases at continental level, but not at intercontinental level. For flows between Italian municipalities, citations decrease with distance in all fields. At continental level, four fields are identified having knowledge flows that grow with distance; at intercontinental level, this occurs in 26 fields. The influence of distance is more limited in the fields of Humanities and Social sciences, much more significant in the Sciences, mainly in the Natural sciences.
翻译:决策者对地理距离对知识流动的影响感兴趣,但预计这些影响会因研究领域而异,通过引用科学文献对地理距离对流动的影响进行分析,观测领域包括2010至2012年意大利出版物和2017年接近结束时的相关引用,对244个领域的地理邻近效应在国家、大陆和洲际一级进行分析,对国家一级和某些大陆一级,但有些情况下在大陆一级,结果并不明显,对于意大利各城市之间的流动而言,所有领域的距离都会减少,在大陆一级,发现有四个领域的知识流动随距离增长而增长;在洲际一级,这发生在26个领域,距离影响在人文和社会科学领域更为有限,在科学领域尤其如此,主要是自然科学领域。