In this paper we investigate what folk models of misinformation exist through semi-structured interviews with a sample of 235 social media users. Work on social media misinformation does not investigate how ordinary users - the target of misinformation - deal with it; rather, the focus is mostly on the anxiety, tensions, or divisions misinformation creates. Studying the aspects of creation, diffusion and amplification also overlooks how misinformation is internalized by users on social media and thus is quick to prescribe "inoculation" strategies for the presumed lack of immunity to misinformation. How users grapple with social media content to develop "natural immunity" as a precursor to misinformation resilience remains an open question. We have identified at least five folk models that conceptualize misinformation as either: political (counter)argumentation, out-of-context narratives, inherently fallacious information, external propaganda, or simply entertainment. We use the rich conceptualizations embodied in these folk models to uncover how social media users minimize adverse reactions to misinformation encounters in their everyday lives.
翻译:在本文中,我们通过与235个社交媒体用户抽样的半结构式访谈调查了哪些民间错误信息模式的存在;关于社交媒体错误信息的工作没有调查普通用户(即错误信息的目标)是如何处理这一问题的;相反,重点主要是焦虑、紧张或分裂造成的错误信息;研究创造、传播和扩展的各个方面也忽略了社交媒体用户如何将错误信息内部化,从而迅速为推定的对错误信息缺乏豁免而规定了“隐蔽”策略;用户如何利用社交媒体内容开发“自然豁免”作为错误信息复原力的先导仍然是一个开放的问题。我们已经确定了至少5个将错误信息概念化为要么政治(反省 ) 、 理论外述、 固有的谬误信息、 外部宣传, 或者简单的娱乐的民间模式。我们利用这些民间模式中体现的丰富概念化来发现社交媒体用户如何最大限度地减少对错误信息日常生活的负面反应。