We propose a novel approach in the assessment of a random risk variable $X$ by introducing magnitude-propensity risk measures $(m_X,p_X)$. This bivariate measure intends to account for the dual aspect of risk, where the magnitudes $x$ of $X$ tell how hign are the losses incurred, whereas the probabilities $P(X=x)$ reveal how often one has to expect to suffer such losses. The basic idea is to simultaneously quantify both the severity $m_X$ and the propensity $p_X$ of the real-valued risk $X$. This is to be contrasted with traditional univariate risk measures, like VaR or Expected shortfall, which typically conflate both effects. In its simplest form, $(m_X,p_X)$ is obtained by mass transportation in Wasserstein metric of the law $P^X$ of $X$ to a two-points $\{0, m_X\}$ discrete distribution with mass $p_X$ at $m_X$. The approach can also be formulated as a constrained optimal quantization problem. This allows for an informative comparison of risks on both the magnitude and propensity scales. Several examples illustrate the proposed approach.
翻译:在评估随机风险变数X美元时,我们建议采用一种新的方法,通过采用量度风险措施(m_X,p_X)美元,评估一个随机风险变数X美元。这一双轨措施的目的是要考虑到风险的双重方面,因为其数额x美元表明所蒙受的损失是何等的,而概率美元P(X=x)美元则表明人们往往要承受这种损失。基本设想是同时量化真实价值风险的重度(m_X)美元和利差($_X)美元。这与传统的非艾氏风险措施(如VaR或预期短缺)相比,后者通常将两种影响混为一格。在瓦瑟斯坦法律的瓦瑟斯坦标准中,通过大众运输获得的美元(m_X,p_X)美元到美元两个百分点($_0,m_X)美元分立的离散分配,而质量为$p_X美元x$。这种办法还可以与传统的非艾风险措施(通常将两者混为两种影响)形成对比。从最简单的形式看,瓦沙度的方法可以证明最佳程度的问题。