The defects of the traditional strapdown inertial navigation algorithms become well acknowledged and the enhanced traditional algorithms were quite recently proposed trying to mitigate both theoretical and algorithmic defects. In this paper, the accuracies of the traditional algorithms, the enhanced algorithms, and the velocity algorithm based on the velocity translation vector are re-investigated in the common case of two samples, for the first time against the true reference provided by the functional iteration approach that has provable convergence and essentially reduces the noncommutativity errors to machine precision. Notably, the analyses by the help of MATLAB symbolic toolbox reveal the marginal effect of the enhanced algorithms, and the error orders of all algorithms analyzed against functional iteration are consistent with the existing literatures. Numerical results under coning motions agree with analyses that the enhanced algorithms have little significant accuracy improvement over the traditional algorithms, while the functional iteration approach possesses significant accuracy superiority even in sustained lowly dynamic conditions.
翻译:传统的带宽惯性导航算法的缺陷已经广为人知,而且增强的传统算法最近被提议试图减少理论和算法缺陷。 本文中,传统算法、增强的算法和基于速度转换矢量的速度算法的精度在两个样本的常见案例中得到了重新调查,这是首次对照功能迭代法提供的真正参照法进行重新调查,该法具有可辨识的趋同性,并基本上减少了机器精确度的非对等性差错。 值得注意的是,由MATLAB符号工具箱帮助进行的分析揭示了强化算法的边际效应,而对照功能迭代法分析的所有算法的误差顺序与现有文献是一致的。 数字组合下的结果与分析一致,即增强的算法与传统算法相比几乎没有显著的精确性改进,而功能迭代法即使处于持续的低动态条件下,也具有显著的精度优势。