Social media radically changed how information is consumed and reported. Moreover, social networks elicited a disintermediated access to an unprecedented amount of content. The world health organization (WHO) coined the term infodemics to identify the information overabundance during an epidemic. Indeed, the spread of inaccurate and misleading information may alter behaviors and complicate crisis management and health responses. This paper addresses information diffusion during the COVID-19 pandemic period with a massive data analysis on YouTube. First, we analyze more than 2M users' engagement in 13000 videos released by 68 different YouTube channels, with different political bias and fact-checking indexes. We then investigate the relationship between each user's political preference and her/his consumption of questionable/reliable information. Our results, quantified using information theory measures, provide evidence for the existence of echo chambers across two dimensions represented by the political bias and by the trustworthiness of information channels. Finally, we observe that the echo chamber structure cannot be reproduced after properly randomizing the users' interaction patterns.
翻译:社交媒体的消费和报道方式发生了巨大变化。此外,社交网络也引发了前所未有的大量内容的中介访问。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)创建了这个术语来识别流行病期间的信息过剩性。事实上,不准确和误导性信息的传播可能会改变行为,并使危机管理和健康反应复杂化。本文件用YouTube上的大量数据分析,讨论了COVID-19大流行期间的信息传播问题。首先,我们分析了超过2M用户在68个不同的YouTube频道上发布的13000个视频中的参与情况,这些视频具有不同的政治偏见和事实核对索引。然后我们调查了每个用户的政治偏好与她/他对可疑/可靠信息的消费之间的关系。我们的结果,通过信息理论措施量化了存在以政治偏见和信息渠道的可信赖性为代表的两个层面的回声室。最后,我们发现,在对用户的互动模式进行适当随机调整后,回声室结构无法复制。