In single-arm clinical trials with survival outcomes, the Kaplan-Meier estimator and its confidence interval are widely used to assess survival probability and median survival time. Since the asymptotic normality of the Kaplan-Meier estimator is a common result, the sample size calculation methods have not been studied in depth. An existing sample size calculation method is founded on the asymptotic normality of the Kaplan-Meier estimator using the log transformation. However, the small sample properties of the log transformed estimator are quite poor in small sample sizes (which are typical situations in single-arm trials), and the existing method uses an inappropriate standard normal approximation to calculate sample sizes. These issues can seriously influence the accuracy of results. In this paper, we propose alternative methods to determine sample sizes based on a valid standard normal approximation with several transformations that may give an accurate normal approximation even with small sample sizes. In numerical evaluations via simulations, some of the proposed methods provided more accurate results, and the empirical power of the proposed method with the arcsine square-root transformation tended to be closer to a prescribed power than the other transformations. These results were supported when methods were applied to data from three clinical trials.
翻译:在具有生存结果的单臂临床试验中,广泛使用卡普兰-梅耶估测仪及其置信间隔来评估生存概率和中位存活时间。由于卡普兰-梅耶估测仪的无症状常态常态是一个常见的结果,因此没有深入研究抽样规模计算方法。现有的样本规模计算方法的基础是使用日志转换法的卡普兰-梅耶估测仪的无症状常态。然而,对日志转换估测仪的少量样本特性在小样本大小(在单臂试验中属于典型情况)方面相当差,而现有方法使用不适当的标准正常近似法来计算样本大小。这些问题会严重影响结果的准确性。在本文件中,我们建议采用其他方法,根据有效的标准正常近似于若干变法确定样本大小的样本大小。在通过模拟进行数字评估时,有些拟议方法提供了更准确的结果,而拟议方法与弧-平方根变换相比,其经验力量往往比其他变换法更接近三种。这些结果得到支持。