Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) is often associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and high healthcare costs. The standard method for predicting the absence, presence, and intensity of pain has long been self-report. However, medical providers struggle to manage patients based on subjective pain reports correctly and pain medications often lead to further difficulties in patient communication as they may cause sedation and sleepiness. Recent studies have shown that objective physiological measures can predict subjective self-reported pain scores for inpatient visits using machine learning (ML) techniques. In this study, we evaluate the generalizability of ML techniques to data collected from 50 patients over an extended period across three types of hospital visits (i.e., inpatient, outpatient and outpatient evaluation). We compare five classification algorithms for various pain intensity levels at both intra-individual (within each patient) and inter-individual (between patients) level. While all the tested classifiers perform much better than chance, a Decision Tree (DT) model performs best at predicting pain on an 11-point severity scale (from 0-10) with an accuracy of 0.728 at an inter-individual level and 0.653 at an intra-individual level. The accuracy of DT significantly improves to 0.941 on a 2-point rating scale (i.e., no/mild pain: 0-5, severe pain: 6-10) at an intra-individual level. Our experimental results demonstrate that ML techniques can provide an objective and quantitative evaluation of pain intensity levels for all three types of hospital visits.
翻译:慢性心血管病(SCD)的疼痛性疼痛症(SCD)往往与发病率、死亡率和高医疗费用的增加有关。预测缺勤、出勤和疼痛强度的标准方法长期以来一直是自我报告。然而,医疗提供者根据主观疼痛报告努力正确管理病人,而止痛药物往往导致病人交流的进一步困难,因为可能导致镇静和睡眠。最近的研究表明,客观的生理措施可以预测使用机器学习(ML)技术进行住院检查的主观自报疼痛分数。我们在这次研究中,评估ML技术与长期从50名病人收集的三种医院访问(即住院、门诊和门诊评估)中的50名病人收集的数据的一般性。我们比较了个人内部(每个病人)和病人之间(病人之间)一级各种疼痛强度水平的五种分类算法。虽然所有经过测试的分类法都比偶然性要好得多,但决定树(DT)模型最能预测11点级(从0-10级)的疼痛程度。在6级和0.65级内部(0.653级)的准确性评估。在2级至10级的内疼痛水平上(D)的精确度为0.9级的剂量。DTA级的精确度。在2级至10级为0.9级的试验。M级的精确度。