There is still debate on whether voters can detect malicious changes in their printed ballot after making their selections on a Ballot Marking Device (BMD). In this study, we altered votes on a voter's ballot after they had made their selections on a BMD. We then required them to examine their ballots for any changes from the slate they used to vote. Overall accuracy was exceptionally high. Participants saw 1440 total contests, and of those 1440, there were a total of 4 errors, so total accuracy was 99.8%. Participants were able to perform with near-perfect accuracy regardless of ballot length, ballot type, number of altered races, and location of altered races. Detection performance was extremely robust. We conclude that with proper direction and resources, voters can be near-perfect detectors of ballot changes on printed paper ballots after voting with a BMD. This finding has significant implications for the voting community as BMD use continues to grow. Research should now focus on identifying administrative and behavioral methods that will prompt and encourage voters to check their BMD-generated ballots before they drop them in the ballot box.
翻译:有关选民在选票标识装置(BMD)上进行选拔后能否发现其打印选票的恶意变化,目前仍有争论。在本研究中,我们在投票人被选入BMD后对选票的投票进行了修改。然后,我们要求选民对选票进行检查,以了解其投票日期的变化。总体准确性非常高。参与者共举行了1440次竞选,在1440次投票中,共有4个错误,因此,总准确率为99.8%。参与者无论投票长度、投票类型、改变的种族数目和改变的种族地点,都能以近乎超标的准确性进行投票。检测表现非常强。我们的结论是,只要有适当的方向和资源,选民可以在用BMD投票后对纸质选票的修改进行近乎完美的检测。随着BMD的使用继续增长,这一发现对投票界有重大影响。现在的研究应侧重于确定行政和行为方法,促使和鼓励选民在投票箱投出之前检查其BMD产生的选票。