Internet usage has changed from its first design. Hence, the current Internet must cope with some limitations, including performance degradation, availability of IP addresses, and multiple security and privacy issues. Nevertheless, to unsettle the current Internet's network layer i.e., Internet Protocol with ICN is a challenging, expensive task. It also requires worldwide coordination among Internet Service Providers , backbone, and Autonomous Services. Additionally, history showed that technology changes e.g., from 3G to 4G, from IPv4 to IPv6 are not immediate, and usually, the replacement includes a long coexistence period between the old and new technology. Similarly, we believe that the process of replacement of the current Internet will surely transition through the coexistence of IP and ICN. Although the tremendous amount of security and privacy issues of the current Internet taught us the importance of securely designing the architectures, only a few of the proposed architectures place the security-by-design. Therefore, this article aims to provide the first comprehensive Security and Privacy analysis of the state-of-the-art coexistence architectures. Additionally, it yields a horizontal comparison of security and privacy among three deployment approaches of IP and ICN protocol i.e., overlay, underlay, and hybrid and a vertical comparison among ten considered security and privacy features. As a result of our analysis, emerges that most of the architectures utterly fail to provide several SP features including data and traffic flow confidentiality, availability and communication anonymity. We believe this article draws a picture of the secure combination of current and future protocol stacks during the coexistence phase that the Internet will definitely walk across.
翻译:因此,目前的互联网必须应对一些限制,包括性能退化、IP地址的可用性以及多重安全和隐私问题。然而,为了消除目前的互联网网络层,即互联网与ICN的互联网协议是一项艰巨、昂贵的任务,还需要互联网服务提供商、骨干和自主服务等全球范围的协调。此外,历史表明,技术变化,例如从3G到4G,从IPv4到IPv6等,并非立即发生,而且通常替换包括老旧和新技术之间的长期共存期。同样,我们认为,替换现有互联网的进程必然会通过IP和ICN的共存而转型。尽管目前互联网的巨大安全和隐私问题告诉我们,必须安全地设计这些架构,只有少数拟议结构将安全地定位于安全。因此,本文章旨在为互联网安全共存结构的首次全面安全和隐私分析提供安全性和隐私的组合。 此外,在目前的安全性和隐私权和保密性分析中,在IPCN的三种部署方式之间,在互联网和互联网的保密性动态分析中,在互联网的透明性分析中,在互联网和透明性分析中,在互联网的保密性分析中,在互联网的当前和透明性分析中,将产生一种完全的保密性分析。