Course selection is challenging for students in higher educational institutions. Existing course recommendation systems make relevant suggestions to the students and help them in exploring the available courses. The recommended courses can influence students' choice of degree program, future employment, and even their socioeconomic status. This paper focuses on identifying and alleviating biases that might be present in a course recommender system. We strive to promote balanced opportunities with our suggestions to all groups of students. At the same time, we need to make recommendations of good quality to all protected groups. We formulate our approach as a multi-objective optimization problem and study the trade-offs between equal opportunity and quality. We evaluate our methods using both real-world and synthetic datasets. The results indicate that we can considerably improve fairness regarding equality of opportunity, but we will introduce some quality loss. Out of the four methods we tested, GHC-Inc and GHC-Tabu are the best performing ones with different advantageous characteristics.
翻译:现有课程建议系统向学生提出相关建议,帮助他们探索现有课程。推荐的课程可以影响学生的学位选择方案、未来就业,甚至影响学生的社会经济地位。本文件的重点是查明和减少可能存在于课程建议系统中的偏见。我们努力通过向所有学生群体提供建议促进平衡机会。与此同时,我们需要向所有受保护群体提出高质量的建议。我们将我们的方法发展成一个多目标优化问题,并研究平等机会与质量之间的取舍。我们用真实世界和合成数据集来评估我们的方法。结果显示我们可以大大改善机会平等方面的公平性,但我们将引入一些质量损失。在我们测试的四种方法中,GHC-Inc和GHC-Tabu是具有不同优势特征的最好的表现方法。