To Fuse or Not to Fuse: Measuring Consistency in Multi-Sensor Fusion for Aerial Robots

Aerial vehicles are no longer limited to flying in open space: recent work has focused on aerial manipulation and up-close inspection. Such applications place stringent requirements on state estimation: the robot must combine state information from many sources, including onboard odometry and global positioning sensors. However, flying close to or in contact with structures is a degenerate case for many sensing modalities, and the robot's state estimation framework must intelligently choose which sensors are currently trustworthy. We evaluate a number of metrics to judge the reliability of sensing modalities in a multi-sensor fusion framework, then introduce a consensus-finding scheme that uses this metric to choose which sensors to fuse or not to fuse. Finally, we show that such a fusion framework is more robust and accurate than fusing all sensors all the time and demonstrate how such metrics can be informative in real-world experiments in indoor-outdoor flight and bridge inspection.