Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have been widely applied in different scenarios thanks to the development of deep neural networks. The proposal of original GAN is based upon the non-parametric assumption of the infinite capacity of networks. It is still unknown whether GANs can generate realistic samples without any prior information. Due to the overconfident assumption, many issues need to be addressed in GANs' training, such as non-convergence, mode collapses, gradient vanishing, overfitting, discriminator forgetting, and the sensitivity of hyperparameters. As acknowledged, regularization and normalization are common methods of introducing prior information that can be used for stabilizing training and improving discrimination. At present, many regularization and normalization methods are proposed in GANs. However, as far as we know, there is no existing survey that has particularly focused on the systematic purposes and developments of these solutions. In this work, we perform a comprehensive survey of the regularization and normalization technologies from different perspectives of GANs training. First, we systematically and comprehensively describe the different perspectives of GANs training and thus obtain the different purposes of regularization and normalization in GANs training. In accordance with the different purposes, we propose a new taxonomy and summary a large number of existing studies. Furthermore, we compare the performance of the mainstream methods on different datasets fairly and investigate the regularization and normalization technologies that have been frequently employed in SOTA GANs. Finally, we highlight the possible future studies in this area.
翻译:由于深层神经网络的发展,在不同的情景中广泛应用了生成Adversarial Network(GANs),由于深层神经网络的发展,最初的GAN建议是基于对网络的无限能力的非参数假设提出的,目前还不清楚GANs能否在没有事先任何信息的情况下产生现实的样本。由于过于自信的假设,许多需要在全球网络的培训中处理的问题,例如非趋同、模式崩溃、坡度消失、斜度消失、过度装配、歧视者遗忘和超常参数的敏感性。正如人们所承认的,正规化和正常化是采用先前信息的共同方法,可用于稳定培训和改善歧视。目前,许多GANs提出了许多正规化和正常化方法。然而,据我们所知,目前没有进行特别侧重于这些解决方案的系统目的和发展的调查。在这项工作中,我们从GANs培训的不同角度对正规化和正常化技术进行了全面调查。首先,我们系统和全面地描述了GANs培训的不同观点,从而在GANs主流技术中获得了不同的正规化和正常化目的。我们最后提议了在GANs的大规模绩效研究中进行新的比较。