Using theoretical and numerical results, we document the accuracy of commonly applied variational Bayes methods across a range of state space models. The results demonstrate that, in terms of accuracy on fixed parameters, there is a clear hierarchy in terms of the methods, with approaches that do not approximate the states yielding superior accuracy over methods that do. We also document numerically that the inferential discrepancies between the various methods often yield only small discrepancies in predictive accuracy over small out-of-sample evaluation periods. Nevertheless, in certain settings, these predictive discrepancies can become meaningful over a longer out-of-sample period. This finding indicates that the invariance of predictive results to inferential inaccuracy, which has been an oft-touted point made by practitioners seeking to justify the use of variational inference, is not ubiquitous and must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
翻译:使用理论和数字结果,我们记录一系列国家空间模型中通用的变异海湾方法的准确性。结果显示,就固定参数的准确性而言,在方法上存在着明确的等级分级,其方法并不近于国家产生优于方法的准确性。我们还用数字来记录,不同方法之间的推论差异往往在小型抽样评估期间仅产生少量的预测准确性差异。然而,在某些情况下,这些预测性差异在较长的抽样期中可能变得有意义。这一发现表明,预测结果的误差导致推断的不准确性,而实践者试图为使用变异推断提供理由的实践者则一再指出,这种误差并非无处不在,必须逐案评估。