There exists a phenomenon that subjectivity highly lies in the daily evaluation process. Our research primarily concentrates on a multi-person evaluation system with anomaly detection to minimize the possible inaccuracy that subjective assessment brings. We choose the two-stage screening method, which consists of rough screening and score-weighted Kendall-$\tau$ Distance to winnow out abnormal data, coupled with hypothesis testing to narrow global discrepancy. Then we use Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation Method(FSE) to determine the significance of scores given by reviewers as well as their reliability, culminating in a more impartial weight for each reviewer in the final conclusion. The results demonstrate a clear and comprehensive ranking instead of unilateral scores, and we get to have an efficiency in filtering out abnormal data as well as a reasonably objective weight determination mechanism. We can sense that through our study, people will have a chance of modifying a multi-person evaluation system to attain both equity and a relatively superior competitive atmosphere.
翻译:我们的研究主要集中于多人评价系统,发现异常点,以尽量减少主观评估可能造成的不准确性。我们选择了两阶段筛选方法,包括粗略筛选和分分比加权肯德尔-$\tau$距离,以摆脱异常数据,同时进行假设测试以缩小全球差异。然后我们使用Fuzzy合成评价方法(FSE)来决定审查员的分数及其可靠性的重要性,最终使每个审查者在最后结论中都得到更加公正的分数。结果显示,对单方分数的分数有明确和全面的分数,我们在过滤异常数据方面有效率,并有一个合理客观的权重确定机制。我们可以感觉到,通过我们的研究,人们将有机会修改一个多人评价系统,以实现公平和相对优越的竞争气氛。