Open Access (OA) facilitates access to articles. But, authors or funders often must pay the publishing costs preventing authors who do not receive financial support from participating in OA publishing and citation advantage for OA articles. OA may exacerbate existing inequalities in the publication system rather than overcome them. To investigate this, we studied 522,411 articles published by Springer Nature. Employing correlation and regression analyses, we describe the relationship between authors affiliated with countries from different income levels, their choice of publishing model, and the citation impact of their papers. A machine learning classification method helped us to explore the importance of different features in predicting the publishing model. The results show that authors eligible for APC waivers publish more in gold-OA journals than others. In contrast, authors eligible for an APC discount have the lowest ratio of OA publications, leading to the assumption that this discount insufficiently motivates authors to publish in gold-OA journals. We found a strong correlation between the journal rank and the publishing model in gold-OA journals, whereas the OA option is mostly avoided in hybrid journals. Also, results show that the countries' income level, seniority, and experience with OA publications are the most predictive factors for OA publishing in hybrid journals.
翻译:但是,作者或资助者往往必须支付出版费用,防止那些没有因参与OA出版和引用而获得财政支助的作者参与OA文章的出版和引用优势。OA可能会加剧出版系统中现有的不平等,而不是克服这些不平等。为了调查这一点,我们研究了Springer自然公司出版的522,411篇文章。我们利用相关和回归分析,描述了与收入水平不同的国家有联系的作者之间的关系、其出版模式的选择,以及其论文的引用影响。机器学习分类方法帮助我们探讨不同特征在预测出版模式方面的重要性。结果显示,有资格获得APC豁免的作者在黄金-OA杂志上比其他刊物上发表更多。相比之下,有资格获得APC折扣的作者在OA出版物上的比例最低,从而得出这样的假设,即这种折扣没有充分激励作者在金-OA杂志上发表。我们发现,在黄金-OA杂志上的期刊等级和出版模式之间有着密切的关联,而OA选项在混合杂志上大多被避免。此外,结果显示,国家收入水平、资历和与OA混合杂志出版物的经验预测了OA出版物。</s>