Trust is fundamental to effective visual data communication between the visualization designer and the reader. Although personal experience and preference influence readers' trust in visualizations, visualization designers can leverage design techniques to create visualizations that evoke a "calibrated trust," at which readers arrive after critically evaluating the information presented. To systematically understand what drives readers to engage in "calibrated trust," we must first equip ourselves with reliable and valid methods for measuring trust. Computer science and data visualization researchers have not yet reached a consensus on a trust definition or metric, which are essential to building a comprehensive trust model in human-data interaction. On the other hand, social scientists and behavioral economists have developed and perfected metrics that can measure generalized and interpersonal trust, which the visualization community can reference, modify, and adapt for our needs. In this paper, we gather existing methods for evaluating trust from other disciplines and discuss how we might use them to measure, define, and model trust in data visualization research. Specifically, we discuss quantitative surveys from social sciences, trust games from behavioral economics, measuring trust through measuring belief updating, and measuring trust through perceptual methods. We assess the potential issues with these methods and consider how we can systematically apply them to visualization research.
翻译:尽管个人经验和偏好影响读者对视觉化的信任,但视觉化设计师能够利用设计技术来创造可视化,从而唤起“校准信任”,读者在对所提供信息进行严格评价后抵达。为了系统地理解是什么促使读者参与“校准信任”,我们必须首先为自己配备衡量信任的可靠和有效方法。计算机科学和数据可视化研究人员尚未就信任定义或衡量标准达成共识,而信任定义或衡量标准对于建立人类数据互动的全面信任模式至关重要。另一方面,社会科学家和行为经济学家已经制定和完善了衡量普遍和人际信任的衡量标准,视觉化社区可以参考、修改和适应我们的需求。在本文中,我们收集了评估其他学科的信任的现有方法,并讨论了我们如何利用这些方法来衡量、界定和模拟数据可视化研究中的信任。具体地说,我们讨论了社会科学的定量调查,相信行为经济学的游戏,通过测量信任度信仰的更新和测量信任度度度度,通过视觉化方法衡量信任度信任度。我们系统地评估了这些研究的潜力,我们如何运用这些方法来应用这些潜在问题。