In recent years, numerous studies have used 'data subject access requests' in a collective manner, to tackle information asymmetries and shed light on data collection and privacy practices of organizations. While successful at increasing transparency, such studies are quite hard to conduct for the simple fact that right of access is an individual right. This means that researchers have to recruit participants and guide them through the often-cumbersome process of access. In this paper, we present an alternative method: to ask participants to delegate their right of access to the researchers. We discuss the legal grounds for doing this, the advantages it can bring to both researchers and data subjects, and present a procedural and technical design to execute it in a manner that ensures data subjects stay informed and in charge during the process. We tested our method in a pilot study in the Netherlands, and found that it creates a win-win for both the researchers and the participants. We also noted differences in how data controllers from various sectors react to such requests and discuss some remaining challenges.
翻译:近年来,许多研究都以集体方式使用“数据主体访问请求”,以解决信息不对称问题,并阐明各组织的数据收集和隐私做法。虽然在增加透明度方面取得了成功,但这类研究很难进行,因为获取权是一项个人权利这一简单的事实。这意味着研究人员必须征聘参与者,通过经常繁忙的访问过程指导他们。在本文中,我们提出了一个替代方法:要求参与者将访问权下放给研究人员。我们讨论了这样做的法律依据、它能够给研究人员和数据主体带来的优势,并提出了程序和技术设计,以确保数据主体在这一过程中始终知情和负责。我们在荷兰的试点研究中测试了我们的方法,发现它为研究人员和参与者创造了双赢局面。我们还注意到不同部门的数据控制者如何对这种请求作出反应的分歧,并讨论了一些仍然存在的挑战。